- #On ipads printopia does not show a print button upgrade#
- #On ipads printopia does not show a print button pro#
Good thing! That is how I found out about the hosting issue. The FM site crapped out on the purchase, support put me on ignore, but I am convinced I would have had “Peggy” as the support rep.
#On ipads printopia does not show a print button upgrade#
I actually tried to upgrade to FM Pro12 today. The problem is that FM GO on the iPad can/will not host a DB for my Mac. It is now Filemaker that is going to grind this whole arrangement to a halt.
#On ipads printopia does not show a print button pro#
I use Filemaker Pro 10 and Filemaker Go for iPad. Then another issue with an Apple product in this potential new arrangement. So that would have been great! Problem solved! Bonlour will take care of the connection. As I under stand it does not need a computer as a host. Then I decided to just get an Epson Airprint compatible printer. Keep it awake display off, closed, under the seat always powered with the adapter printer plugged in to USB. The whole point is to not have laptop always open on the seat. Trouble here is the laptop will go to sleep when the lid closes. I was going to put Printopia on a G4 Powerbook and leave that always on and to host the printer. This arrangement has worked great for over 8 years. It is an office AIO so I power it with a small inverter. I currently use Canon printers with an Apple laptop. I want to use an iPads in service vehicles. That’d give more incentive to buy more spacious and higher priced models and, since Apple already sells a 16GB model, they tacitly endorse 16GB as the base requirement for an iPad user.)Īll I use are Apple equipment in my company. (If it’s a storage space issue, make the feature available as “dual-user” on 32 GB iPads and “up to four users” on 64GB models.
Enable multi-user support in iOS already! One iPad, even between only two people, just isn’t enough.Įnabling multi-user support will actually end up selling more iPads. Enabling multi-user support, makes the iPad even more attractive to families and, once families get their first iPad, they quickly realize that they need more than one. Not only are they failing to “delight customers,” but they are failing to realize that it won’t impinge iPad sales, but enhance them.
If we’re right about why iOS still doesn’t have multi-user support, then Apple’s wrong. That Apple hasn’t done so long ago suggests to us that they’d rather sell an iPad to every family member than a single iPad per family. That said, it would be relatively trivial to bring at least Fast User Switching over to iOS from OS X.
Apple could be doing anything from dispatching a high-level team to work on it overnight to filing it in the circular file and you’d get back the same response. MacDailyNews Take: Standard form response. ‘After further investigation it has been determined that this is a known issue, which is currently being investigated by engineering,’ the official response from Apple Developer Connection’s Worldwide Developer Relations team reads.” Hughes reports, “In the suggestion submitted to Apple, the developer simply requested that the company add support for multiple users to the iPad. “Apple’s Bug Reporter includes an option to specify that a submission isn’t a bug report, but rather a suggestion.” “The developer reached out to AppleInsider after they received a reply from Apple after submitting a bug report,” Hughes reports. “Apple has signaled that it is aware of a desire to support multiple users on one iPad, and that the issue is ‘currently being investigated’ by the company’s engineering team,” Neil Hughes reports for AppleInsider.
0 kommentar(er)
